Gang Luan v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• interpreting the advisory committee’s note as “explaining that Supplemental Rule G(2)(f) was intended to codify the interpretation of Rule E(2)(a) set out in Mondragon”
• finding due process satisfied where the defendant had an opportunity to challenge the restraint at a hearing in Hong Kong, among other considerations
• “In personam jurisdiction is jurisdiction over the defendant. Jn rem jurisdiction is jurisdiction over the property.”
• “[T]he district court restrained all assets owned or controlled by Luan (and his Hong Kong co-defendants) located in the United States up to $23.7 million, until the conclusion of the Hong Kong proceedings.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).