Skip to main content

Gandy v. State

Citations

  • 846 So. 2d 1141
  • 2003 WL 21087995

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the Florida Supreme Court lacked jurisdiction to review a per curiam unelaborated denial of relief from a DCA that merely cited to a case or statute without also containing a discussion of the facts of the case
  • “This Court does not have jurisdiction to review per curiam decisions of the district courts of appeal that merely affirm with citations to cases not pending review in this Court.” (quoting Persaud v. State, 838 So. 2d 529, 532 (Fla. 2003)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.