Gamez v. Lopez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that non-resident defendants had no legitimate expectation of privacy in apartment in which they briefly conducted drug-dealing activities
• holding that “in determining whether a defendant is able to show the violation of his (and not someone else’s
• holding that “in determining whether a defendant is able to show the violation of his (and not someone else’s
• holding that an overnight guest has a legitimate expectation of privacy in the host's home that society is prepared to recognize as reasonable
• recognizing that legal protections inure to residents of a home “even when they merely occupy it rent free — so long as they actually live there”
• holding that defendants had no legitimate expectation of privacy in, and thus could not challenge the search of, another's dwelling which they had visited only for the commercial purpose of bagging cocaine

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).