GameFly, Inc. v. Postal Regulatory Commission

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• challenge to PRC’s remedial order resolving differential treatment by USPS among businesses distributing DVDs by mail
• “[T]he Commission’s findings establish that the Postal Service’s terms of service discrimination against GameFly ... led to the companies’ use of different mailers.”
• “[T]he use of different mailers is itself the product of the service discrimination.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Douglas Carlson v. PRC
  D.C. Circuit· 2019-09-13· cited 44×
• Southwestern Elec. Power Co. v. U.S. E.P.A.
  Fifth Circuit· 2019-04-12· cited 38×
• Resolute Forest Products, Inc. v. United States Department of Agriculture
  District of Columbia· 2016-05-17· cited 10×
• Resolute Forest Products, Inc. v. U.S. Department of Agriculture
  District of Columbia· 2015-09-09· cited 9×
• United States Postal Service v. Postal Regulatory Commission
  D.C. Circuit· 2014-04-08· cited 2×
• Southern California Edison Co. v. United States Postal Service
  District of Columbia· 2016-01-14

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.
  Supreme Court· 1983-06-24· cited 8,453×
• Amer Fed Govt 2924 v. FLRA
  D.C. Circuit· 2006-12-05· cited 7×