Gambuti v. Colvin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that because plaintiff sufficiently pled her FAL claim, she also pled enough to establish a UCL claim
• holding that the plaintiff sufficiently pleaded a CLRA violation when she was not required to accept Terms of Use and the defendant’s affirmative misrepresentations led her to believe registration was free, when in fact she was charged $99
• noting applicability of “reasonable consumer” test when addressing false ad vertising claim under Section 17500 of California’s Business and Professions Code
• unjust 1 parties.” (quoting Paracor Fin., Inc. v. Gen. Elec. Capital Corp., 96 F.3d 1151, 1167 (9th 2 Cir.1996)
• unjust 1 parties.” (quoting Paracor Fin., Inc. v. Gen. Elec. Capital Corp., 96 F.3d 1151, 1167 (9th 2 Cir.1996)
• “plaintiff has sufficiently stated a claim for unjust enrichment in the alternative to 22 her breach-of-contract claim.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).