Gambrell v. Bridges

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the record did not support a claim that the plaintiffs PTSD was an unfitting condition where plaintiff had a commendable military record
• stating, in a military pay case, that “‘a cause of action against the government has ‘first accrued’ only when all the events which fix the government’s alleged liability have occurred and the plaintiff was or should have been aware of their existence’” 15 (emphasis in original
• “[Although the plaintiff is proceeding pro se, he still has the burden of establishing jurisdiction.”
• “[Wjhile the ABCMR does consider VA disability ratings as relevant evidence during its deliberations, it is not bound by them, and these ratings are in no way ultimately determinative of claims for military disability retirement.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).