Supreme Court of South Carolina· 4/10/1989
Gamble v. State
Citations
- 379 S.E.2d 118
- 298 S.C. 176
- 1989 S.C. LEXIS 72
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the PCR rules “contemplate an adjudication on the merits of the original petition, one bite of the apple as it were.”
- holding the South Carolina Rules of Civil Procedure apply to all civil actions, a petition for PCR is a civil action, the Act specifically incorporates the applicable rules of civil practice, and Rule 41(a
- stating rules applicable to post-conviction relief actions should not be construed in manner which operate as a trap for the unwary lawyer
- stating rules applicable to post-conviction relief actions should not be construed in manner which operate as a trap for the unwary lawyer
- allowing a successive PCR application where the applicant unknowingly withdrew his first PCR application with prejudice
- stating rules applicable to post-conviction relief actions should not be construed in manner which operate as a trap for the unwary or deprive an applicant of the adjudication on the merits of his original petition
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Toal, Gregory, Harwell, Chandler, Finney
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
13 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Elam v. South Carolina Department of TransportationSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2004-09-13· cited 287×
- Matthews v. EvattFourth Circuit· 1997-01-28· cited 234×
- Aice v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1991-09-09· cited 71×
- Gilbert v. MooreFourth Circuit· 1998-01-22· cited 61×
- Odom v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1999-11-15· cited 24×
- Nelson Ex Rel. Nelson v. QHG of South Carolina, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2003-04-14· cited 13×
- In Re Nov. 4, 2008 Bluffton ElectionSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2009-12-07· cited 11×
- Brannon v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2001-06-25· cited 5×
- Pettinato v. EagletonD. South Carolina· 2006-09-21· cited 2×
- Hiott v. StateCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2007-10-11· cited 1×
- Hamilton v. FulghamSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2009-12-07· cited 1×
- Unnamed caseFourth Circuit· 1998-01-22
- Gilbert v. MooreFourth Circuit· 1998-02-24
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.