Gambino v. Holder

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that blind delegation of investigation to law enforcement fell short of Title IX’s requirements
• stating that Title IX liability depends in part on finding that the harassment was based on the victim’s sex
• recognizing 4-3 split in favor of no requirement to show further post-notice acts of actual harassment while declining to take a po- sition
• “[A] school district may rely on a law-enforcement investigation in some circumstances.” (emphasis added)
• “Specifically, the school must have actual knowledge that harassment has occurred, is occurring, or that there is a ‘substantial risk that sexual abuse would occur.’” (quoting Alvin Indep. Sch. Dist., 840 F. App’x at 775)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).