Gambello v. Time Warner Communications, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• imposing sanctions on plaintiff’s counsel because “it was incumbent upon counsel . . . to withdraw any claims that became unsupportable”
• “Plaintiff’s fundamental disagreement with the conclusions his supervisors drew from incidents which he admits occurred . . . is not evidence that his supervisors’ appraisals were a sham, invented to mask discrimination”
• “Although attorneys’ fees to the movant are authorized, here the purposes of Rule 11 would not be well-served by such an award because of the complications of determining the incremental expense caused to defendant by the particular conduct found sanctionable.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).