Gamal Abdi Moussa v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the exhaustion requirement of subsection 1252(d)(1) applies “only to an ‘alien’” “challenging a final order of removal” and not to “‘any person.’”
• holding Section 1252(d)(1) does not apply to citizenship claims because the exhaustion require- ment “do[es] not apply to ‘any person’ challenging a final order of removal, only to an ‘alien’—precisely what [the petitioner] claims not to be”
• “[W]e necessarily have jurisdiction to determine our jurisdiction.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).