Gam Wah Restaurant, Inc. v. Ring

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that 19 pro se litigants must adhere to the same procedural requirements as other litigants
• holding that the rule announced in Davis was available during Petitioner’s initial habeas petition because “the record does not establish that he would have been prohibited from amending his initial habeas motion to assert a Davis argument related to his § 924(c
• “[I]t is axiomatic that pro se litigants, whatever their ability 15 level, are subject to the same procedural requirements as other litigants.”
• “[I]t is axiomatic that pro se 23 1 litigants, whatever their ability level, are subject to the same procedural 2 requirements as other litigants.”
• “[I]t is axiomatic that pro se litigants, whatever their ability level, are subject to the same 22 procedural requirements as other litigants.”
• “[I]t is axiomatic that pro se litigants, whatever 24 1 their ability level, are subject to the same procedural requirements as other litigants.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).