Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co. v. Wallace
Citations
- 223 U.S. 481
- 32 S. Ct. 205
- 56 L. Ed. 516
- 1912 U.S. LEXIS 2249
Syllabus
<p>Damages caused by failure to deliver goods is not traceable to a violation of the Interstate Commerce Law, and is not within the provisions of §§ 8 and 9 of the act; the jurisdiction of the commission and the United States courts is not exclusive. Texas & Pacific Railway v. Abilene Cotton Oil Co., 204 U. S. 426,' distinguished.</p> <p>While statutes have no extra-territorial operation and courts of one government cannot enforce the penal laws of another, state courts have jurisdiction of civil and transitory actions created by a foreign statute, provided it is no.t of a character opposed to the public policy of the State in which it is brought.</p> <p>Jurisdiction is not defeated by implication; and there is no presumption that Congress intends to prevent state courts from exercising jurisdiction already possessed by them, and under which they have power to hear and determine causes of action created by Federal statute. Robb v. Com,oily, 111 U. S. 637.</p> <p>When a Federal statute creating an action, such as the Carmack amendment, is silent on the subject of jurisdiction, the presumption is that the action may be asserted in a state, as well as in a Federal, court.</p> <p>The Carmack amendment to the Hepburn act of June 29, 1906, 34 Stat. 584, 595, c. 3591, is not unconstitutional. Atlantic Coast Line v. Riverside Mills, 219 U. S. 186.</p> <p>Qucere, and not determinable in this action, as the carrier failed to plead or prove the cause of non-delivery, whether the Carmack amendment makes the initial carrier an insurer, or deprives it of the right to contract with the shipper against liability for damages not caused by its own or the connecting carrier’s negligence.</p> <p>Under the Carmack amendment, wherev,er , the carrier voluntarily accepts goods for shipment to a point on another line in anothet State, it is conclusively treated as having made a through contract, Atlantic Coast Line v. Riverside Mills, 219 U. S. 186; it thereby elects to treat connecting car
Judges: Lamar
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.