Nevada Supreme Court· 1/5/1967
Galloway v. Truesdell
Citations
- 422 P.2d 237
- 83 Nev. 13
- 1967 Nev. LEXIS 217
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that the legislature has the sole power to frame and enact legislation
- recognizing that the legislature has the sole power to frame and enact legislation
- recognizing that the interpretive 'NRS Chapter 178 provides ample evidence to dispel any doubts that the Legislature intended \proceedings\ to refer to the prosecutorial proceedings, not the competency proceedings. See, e.g., NRS 178.400(2)(c
- noting that when the Legislature chooses one option and not another, it is presumed that the Legislature did so purposely
- noting that “any power or authority that is inherent or incidental to a judicial function is properly within the realm of judicial power”
- explaining that one department’s action, even when it overlaps or duplicates another department’s functions, is valid to the extent that it is derived from, and can be traced back to, the original department’s basic source of power
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Craven, Thompson, Collins
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
97 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- In Re the Salary of the Juvenile DirectorWashington Supreme Court· 1976-06-24· cited 130×
- Presley v. Mississippi State Hwy. Com'nMississippi Supreme Court· 1992-12-03· cited 88×
- Salt Lake City v. OhmsUtah Supreme Court· 1994-08-18· cited 87×
- Gary v. SheriffNevada Supreme Court· 1980-01-22· cited 69×
- In re Clerk of Lyon County Courts' CompensationSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1976-04-16· cited 68×
- Halverson v. HardcastleNevada Supreme Court· 2007-07-27· cited 66×
- Keating v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma· 1996-05-14· cited 59×
- State v. LynchSupreme Court of Oklahoma· 1990-07-24· cited 55×
- Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. RadeckiNevada Supreme Court· 2018-09-13· cited 54×
- Landreth v. MalikNevada Supreme Court· 2011-05-12· cited 52×
- Barrett v. BairdNevada Supreme Court· 1995-12-19· cited 42×
- Secretary of State v. STATE LEGISLATURENevada Supreme Court· 2004-07-14· cited 41×
- Dickson v. Second Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court· 1979-03-16· cited 41×
- State v. Second Judicial District Court ex rel. County of WashoeNevada Supreme Court· 2000-11-02· cited 40×
- Earl v. Tulsa County District CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma· 1980-01-28· cited 39×
- Cedar Rapids Human Rights Commission v. Cedar Rapids Community School DistrictSupreme Court of Iowa· 1974-10-16· cited 38×
- Timpanogos Planning & Water Management Agency v. Central Utah Water Conservancy DistrictUtah Supreme Court· 1984-10-10· cited 37×
- Desert Irrigation, Ltd. v. State of NevadaNevada Supreme Court· 1997-08-28· cited 32×
- Hernandez v. Bennett-HaronNevada Supreme Court· 2012-10-25· cited 32×
- Warren County v. Judges of the Fifth Judicial District of IowaSupreme Court of Iowa· 1976-06-30· cited 30×
Cites
27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Matter of DaviesNew York Court of Appeals· 1901-10-01· cited 93×
- Searle v. YensenNebraska Supreme Court· 1929-07-19· cited 56×
- Powers v. IsleyArizona Supreme Court· 1947-07-11· cited 54×
- Nevada Tax Commission v. HicksNevada Supreme Court· 1957-05-03· cited 51×
- Oates v. RogersSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1940-11-11· cited 42×
- State ex rel. Perry v. ArringtonNevada Supreme Court· 1884-07-15· cited 38×
- Montgomery v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama· 1935-01-31· cited 37×
- Clark v. ClarkNevada Supreme Court· 1964-02-11· cited 34×
- Brundage v. BrundageNew York Court of Appeals· 1875-04-27· cited 31×
- State ex rel. Fowler v. MooreNevada Supreme Court· 1922-04-15· cited 25×
- Floeck v. Bureau of RevenueNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1940-02-29· cited 24×
- Frazier v. MoffattCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1951-12-27· cited 21×
- San Pedro, Los Angeles & Salt Lake Railroad v. BaileyNevada Supreme Court· 1909-07-15· cited 19×
- In re Arascada for a Writ of Habeas CorpusNevada Supreme Court· 1920-04-15· cited 17×
- Tuolumne County v. Stanislaus CountyCalifornia Supreme Court· 1856-07-01· cited 11×
- Great Northern Railway Co. v. McDonnellNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1950-12-19· cited 10×
- Hard v. DepaoliNevada Supreme Court· 1935-03-04· cited 9×
- Blakeslee v. BlakesleeNevada Supreme Court· 1917-10-15· cited 8×
- State ex rel. Summerfield v. Moran ex rel. County of WashoeNevada Supreme Court· 1919-07-15· cited 8×
- Nevada v. Lincoln County Power District No. 1Nevada Supreme Court· 1941-03-21· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.