Galloway v. Travelers Ins. Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Rule 56 embodies the same concepts explained by Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 106 S. Ct. 2548, 91 L. Ed. 2d 265 (1986), in construing Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56
• holding that Rule 56 embodies the same concepts explained by Celotex Corp. v. Catrett , 477 U.S. 317 , 106 S.Ct. 2548 , 91 L.Ed.2d 265 (1986), in construing Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56
• stating that for summary judgment, movant had burden of production only where movant would have had burden of proof at trial
• “The plain language of Rule 56(c) mandates the entry of summary judgment . . . against a party who fails to make a showing sufficient to establish the existence of an element essential to that party’s case . . . .”
• petition for rehearing pending on other issues

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).