Galloway v. Pruitt

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting an action for immediate possession is not a “pure[,]” “true[,]” or “traditional” habeas corpus action, because while it should be handled expeditiously, none of the procedural rules of habeas corpus apply and a full custody hearing may be held in the court’s discretion
• noting an action for immediate possession is not a “pure[,]” “true[,]” or “traditional” habeas corpus action, because while it should be handled expeditiously, none of the procedural rules of habeas corpus apply and a full custody hearing may be held in the court’s discretion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).