Gallop v. Rose

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[t]hus, [the insurer] had no equitable right to subrogation until [the insured’s] total damages were ascertained and recouped, a condition precedent met when the jury returned a verdict of $100,000.00”
• “[t]hus, [the insurer] had no equitable right to subrogation until [the insured’s] total damages were ascertained and recouped, a condition precedent met when the jury returned a verdict of $100,000.00”
• trial court did not err in molding verdict to reflect insurance company’s subrogation rights

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).