Skip to main content
· 2/10/2000

Gallo v. Mayor and Tp. Council

Citations

  • 744 A.2d 1219
  • 328 N.J. Super. 117

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding the re-zoning of property to allow for a higher density to the benefit of a particular developer was not spot zoning because it was \part of a comprehensive plan to benefit the community . . . and . . . not simply enacted to benefit certain individuals\
  • rejecting argument that re-zoning a property to allow higher density for development by a private party was impermissible spot zoning given that it was consistent with a comprehensive plan to benefit the community and was not enacted to benefit only certain individuals

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Judges King, Paul G. Levy and Carchman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.