Gallo v. Board of Regents of the University of California

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “It seems clear that the remedies available under the FEHA are more comprehensive both in scope and in amount of recovery”
• courts “may consider ... the EEOC right to sue letter ..., either as referenced in the complaint or as public records subject to judicial notice.”
• “[T]he Court may consider both the EEOC right to sue letter and the EEOC charge . . . as public records subject to judicial notice.”
• “[T]he Court may consider both the EEOC right to sue letter and the EEOC charge . . . as public records subject to judicial notice.”
• “[T]he Court may consider both the EEOC right to sue letter and the EEOC charge, either as referenced in the complaint or as public records subject to judicial notice.”
• “[T]he Court may consider both the EEOC right to sue letter and the EEOC charge, either as referenced in the complaint or as public records subject to judicial notice.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).