Gallo Motor Center, Inc. v. Mazda Motor of America, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The jurisdictional scope of the plaintiff’s court action depends on the 2 scope of the EEOC and investigation.”
• no Confrontation Clause violation in district court’s quashing 26 defense subpoena where thorough cross-examination of informant enabled jury to sufficiently 27 assess informant’s credibility

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).