Galland v. Galland
Citations
- 44 Cal. 475
Syllabus
<p>Contempt oe Court oe Equity.—A husband, who lives separate from, his wife, and has been adjudged by a Court of equity to pay her a certain sum monthly for her support and that of her infant child, is not guilty of contempt for not paying the sum, if he is unable to pay it and has not voluntarily created the disability for the purpose of avoiding the payment.</p> <p>Idem.—A husband attached for contempt alleged to be committed by not paying a monthly sum for his wife’s support, which he has been adjudged to pay by a Court of equity, may purge himself from the contempt by showing that he is unable to pay it, and that this inability has not been voluntarily created by his own act.</p> <p>Statute in Relation to Contempt.—The statute of this State in relation to contempt is a limitation upon the power formerly exercised by Courts to punish for contempt.</p>
Judges: Belcher
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
19 cases in this archive cite this case.
- In re the Estate of JessupCalifornia Supreme Court· 1889-11-30· cited 119×
- Moffat v. MoffatCalifornia Supreme Court· 1980-07-10· cited 92×
- Moss v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court· 1998-02-02· cited 76×
- Ex parte SpencerCalifornia Supreme Court· 1890-03-24· cited 75×
- Foley v. FoleyCalifornia Supreme Court· 1898-02-04· cited 73×
- H. J. Heinz Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court· 1954-01-29· cited 41×
- Rudd v. RuddCourt of Appeals of Kentucky· 1919-05-27· cited 37×
- Hendryx v. FitzpatrickU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts· 1884-04-02· cited 23×
- Clark v. ClarkTennessee Supreme Court· 1925-09-06· cited 20×
- Johnson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court· 1883-06-27· cited 20×
- Levan v. RichardsIdaho Supreme Court· 1896-01-24· cited 16×
- State ex rel. McLean v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court· 1908-10-24· cited 13×
- In Re FeiockCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1989-10-31· cited 12×
- State ex rel. Gemmell v. ClancyMontana Supreme Court· 1900-07-30· cited 12×
- In re HambergIdaho Supreme Court· 1923-07-28· cited 10×
- In Re JenningsCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1982-06-30· cited 6×
- Lutz v. District Court of the First Judicial DistrictNevada Supreme Court· 1906-07-15· cited 5×
- In re GeiserD. Montana· 1904-04-01· cited 2×
- State v. RustCourt of Appeals of Tennessee· 1874-10-15
Cites
2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.