Skip to main content
· 10/28/2010

Gallagher Evelius & Jones, LLP v. Joppa Drive-Thru, Inc.

Citations

  • 7 A.3d 160
  • 195 Md. App. 583
  • 2010 Md. App. LEXIS 158

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Whether a document is subject to withholding from discovery as a result of some privilege is essentially a question of fact to be determined by the trial court.”
  • “Even if . . . the precise action taken by the circuit court is not specifically prescribed by a rule or statute,” the court has the authority to administer and control discovery
  • “Even if . . . the precise action taken by the circuit court is not specifically prescribed by a rule or 25 statute, the court has the ability, in general, to definitively and effectively administer and control discovery, as the Maryland Rules contemplate.” (cleaned up)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Panel: Zarnoch

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.