Galen H. Hoover, M.D., Inc., P.S. v. Cloudcrest Ltd.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[W]e carve up the incident into segments and judge each on its own terms to see if the officer was reasonable at each stage.”
• “[Police do] not need to consider all feasible alternatives in serving [a] war-rant____But that is not the same as saying that any specific alternative is per se reasonable”
• in determining reasonableness, we “carve up the incident into segments and judge each on its own terms to see if the officer was reasonable at each stage.”
• district court did not abuse its discretion in admitting forensic pathologist’s testimony that “the wound was consistent with a certain position,” noting that pathologist “has been involved in autopsies on at least 75 bodies that have been subjected to bullet wounds”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).