Galehead, Inc., an Oregon Corporation, Cross-Appellee v. M/v Anglia, in Rem

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that contractor was seemingly capable of performing under its agreement without resort to subcontractors
• finding that supplier provided the bunkers at the trader’s request, and that the trader is not a “person [] . . . presumed to have authority to procure necessaries”
• observing that a contract 4 supplier “‘provided’ necessaries to the vessel under the contract irrespective of 5 how, or by whom, the delivery was carried out”
• finding that supplier provided the bunkers at the trader's request, and that the trader is not a \person [ ] ... presumed to have authority to procure necessaries\
• noting that, in determining whether subcontractor can assert maritime lien against vessel owner, the court must determine whether the facts are “more like Bonanni ... [or] Marine Coatings or Stevens Technical ”
• looking to Marine Coatings and- Bonanni to determine if a subcontractor can assert a maritime lien

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).