Gale Edgar v. Jac Products, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an employee was permissibly terminated when she was unable to return to work at the end of FMLA leave
• stating that “the employer’s motive is an integral part of the analysis” in retaliation claims
• noting that “retaliation claims impose liability on employers that act against employees specifically because those employees invoked their FMLA rights” (citation omitted)
• stating that “the employer’s motive is an integral part of the analysis” in retaliation claims
• noting that the plaintiff’s claim that she was unlawfully terminated during her FMLA leave “is properly construed as invoking the entitlement [(also known as interference
• acknowledging that improper termination of employment based on conduct related to the FMLA would constitute FMLA interference

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).