S.D. California· 5/12/1998
Galarza v. United States
Citations
- 179 F.R.D. 291
- 41 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1100
- 98 Daily Journal DAR 11338
- 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7427
- 1998 WL 257071
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Because Galarza has brought suit under the FTCA, federal law will govern the 14 application of privilege.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Battaglia
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- In Re: GRAND JURY INVESTIGATION United States of America, Movant-Appellee, v. John Doe, Interested-Party-AppellantSecond Circuit· 2005-02-22· cited 61×
- Newport Pacific Inc. v. County of San DiegoS.D. California· 2001-06-18· cited 13×
- Tucker v. United StatesS.D. West Virginia· 2001-04-06· cited 12×
- Bethel v. United StatesD. Colorado· 2007-04-16· cited 4×
- Davila v. PatelE.D. Pennsylvania· 2005-09-13· cited 2×
Other cases named Galarza v. United States
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.