W.D. Pennsylvania· 2/3/1966
Gaito v. Strauss
Citations
- 249 F. Supp. 923
- 1966 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6498
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- construing contours of § 1983 malicious prosecution claim in light of elements of common law claim
- plaintiff alleged, among other things, that defendants “employed false and perjured evidence” against him, and court analyzed that claim as one for malicious prosecution
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Marsh
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
42 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Kauffman v. MossThird Circuit· 1970-01-14· cited 243×
- Thomas A. Guerro v. Roger F. Mulhearn, Ralph F. Andrews v. Kathy Decote YoungFirst Circuit· 1974-06-24· cited 166×
- Eddie Adams v. Norman Carlson, Director of the Federal Bureau of PrisonsSeventh Circuit· 1973-10-31· cited 139×
- Ammlung v. City of ChesterThird Circuit· 1974-03-28· cited 91×
- Everett v. City of ChesterE.D. Pennsylvania· 1975-03-10· cited 37×
- Joseph Gaito v. Honorable Henry Ellenbogen, Honorable J. Frank Graff, Honorable William C. Sennett, Honorable Robert W. Duggan and A. T. PrasseThird Circuit· 1970-04-28· cited 35×
- Clark v. ZimmermanM.D. Pennsylvania· 1975-05-07· cited 35×
- Albert C. Hughes v. Howard Smith and Robert TatumThird Circuit· 1968-02-01· cited 30×
- Walter Frank Knowles Alias John Frank Smith v. Dale CarsonFifth Circuit· 1969-11-07· cited 30×
- Martin Slate v. William F. McFetridgeSeventh Circuit· 1973-09-28· cited 26×
- Duncombe v. State of New YorkS.D. New York· 1967-04-11· cited 25×
- Reginald D. Still v. G. Raymond NicholsFirst Circuit· 1969-06-05· cited 24×
- Hughes v. SmithD. New Jersey· 1967-03-08· cited 23×
- Selas Corp. v. Wilshire Oil Co.E.D. Pennsylvania· 1972-12-11· cited 23×
- Auld v. Mobay Chemical CompanyW.D. Pennsylvania· 1969-06-05· cited 22×
- Drum v. NasutiE.D. Pennsylvania· 1986-11-25· cited 20×
- Hill v. NelsonN.D. California· 1967-08-24· cited 20×
- Lombardi v. PeaceS.D. New York· 1966-09-26· cited 19×
- Grady Carroll Ouzts v. Maryland National Insurance CompanyNinth Circuit· 1972-12-06· cited 16×
- Greene v. State of New YorkS.D. New York· 1967-12-08· cited 16×
Cites
98 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1963-01-14· cited 12,871×
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court· 1961-10-09· cited 9,088×
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court· 1963-03-18· cited 8,419×
- Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court· 1964-06-22· cited 6,121×
- Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1964-06-22· cited 5,250×
- Monroe v. PapeSupreme Court· 1961-02-20· cited 4,784×
- Douglas v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1963-04-29· cited 3,330×
- Linkletter v. WalkerSupreme Court· 1965-06-07· cited 2,898×
- Dombrowski v. PfisterSupreme Court· 1965-04-26· cited 2,255×
- Henry v. MississippiSupreme Court· 1965-03-01· cited 1,121×
- McNeese v. Board of Education for Community Unit School District 187 CahokiaSupreme Court· 1963-06-03· cited 954×
- Hurn v. OurslerSupreme Court· 1933-04-17· cited 808×
- Harman v. ForsseniusSupreme Court· 1965-04-27· cited 645×
- Basista v. WeirThird Circuit· 1965-01-08· cited 327×
- Virgil Norton, Virgil Wesley and James Chapman v. James P. McShaneFifth Circuit· 1964-07-15· cited 189×
- Suckow Borax Mines Consolidated, Inc. v. Borax Consolidated, LimitedNinth Circuit· 1950-10-26· cited 185×
- Barbara A. Nesmith and Richard A. Nesmith v. H. D. AlfordFifth Circuit· 1963-05-30· cited 175×
- Robichaud v. RonanNinth Circuit· 1965-10-08· cited 148×
- Billy Ray Stringer v. Robert DilgerTenth Circuit· 1963-01-15· cited 122×
- Donald A. Swan v. Board of Higher Education of the City of New York by Gustave G. Rosenberg, Its Chairman, George A. Pierson, and Margaret v. KielySecond Circuit· 1963-06-04· cited 121×
Other cases named Gaito v. Strauss
4 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.