District Court of Appeal of Florida· 7/28/1967
Gaisford v. Neuschatz
Citations
- 201 So. 2d 635
- 1967 Fla. App. LEXIS 4661
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- implicitly recognizing that a contract made in violation of Chapter 467 would be unenforceable, but finding plaintiff's activity an isolated transaction not constituting the practice of architecture so as to bring into play the rule
- construing the prior version of § 481.223
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Andrews, Gonzalez, Jose, Walden
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Rolls v. Bliss & Nyitray, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1982-02-05· cited 45×
- Food Management, Inc. v. Blue Ribbon Beef Pack, Inc., Blue Ribbon Beef Pack, Inc. v. Food Management, Inc.Eighth Circuit· 1969-07-30· cited 18×
- George M. Hedla, Etc. v. Blaine McCool Etc., George M. Hedla, Etc. v. Blaine McCool Etc.Ninth Circuit· 1973-04-10· cited 18×
- O'Kon and Co., Inc. v. RiedelDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-03-31· cited 6×
- Locke v. ShoreN.D. Florida· 2010-02-04· cited 4×
- Gaisford v. NeuschatzSupreme Court of Florida· 1967-12-15
- Warde v. DavisD. Colorado· 1972-11-28
Cites
2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Other cases named Gaisford v. Neuschatz
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.