Gaiocchio v. State
Citations
- 9 Tex. Ct. App. 387
Syllabus
<p>1. Retailing Liquors — The “Bell-Punch Law.”—Appellant, who was a licensed retailer, was indicted and tried for violation of the “bell-punch law,” by selling a drink of whiskey and failing to turn the crank of the proper register. The evidence showed that the bar-tender of the appellant made the sale in the absence of the appellant, and there was no proof of the appellant’s complicity in the bar-tender’s failure to register the drink.</p> <p>2. Plea. —The record must show that the defendant pleaded to the accusation, or that he stood mute and the plea of not guilty was entered for him.</p>
Judges: Hurt
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.