Gainor v. Douglas County, Georgia

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that since § 1367(d) applied, the “plaintiff’s state law claims [were not] barred by Georgia’s applicable statute of limitations, as the limitation period [was] tolled while [those] claims [were] pending before [that] [c]ourt”
• “[P]laintiff must proffer evidence that the officer in question had a reasonable opportunity to intervene.”
• “[P]laintiff must proffer evidence that the officer in question had a reasonable opportunity to intervene.”
• angry and hostile behavior relevant to a determination of reasonable suspicion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).