Gainesville Glass Co. v. Don Hammond, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• estoppel charge error because no evidence appellant remained silent after appellee insisted that work be completed pursuant to the alleged oral contract
• “[A]n injured party cannot be placed in a better position than he would have been in if the contract had not been breached.”
• “[A]n injured party cannot be placed in a better position than he would have been in if the contract had not been breached.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).