Gaines v. BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD OF MICHIGAN

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction where the plaintiff’s “state law claims may substantially expand the scope of this case beyond that necessary and relevant to” the plaintiff’s federal claim
• “[I]n almost every case with supplemental state claims, the courts and counsel are unduly preoccupied with substantive and procedural problems in reconciling the two bodies of law and providing a fair and meaningful proceeding.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).