Gaines v. Astrue

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that an “ALJ did not explain in his decision why he concluded that [the claimant] could stoop occasionally despite the limited lumbar forward flexion found by two physicians”
• finding that an “ALJ did not explain in his decision why he concluded that [the claimant] could stoop occasionally despite the limited lumbar forward flexion found by two physicians”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).