Gaines-Tabb v. ICI Explosives, USA, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that a fertilizer formulation was not unreasonably dangerous even though an alternate formula would have been equally effective and would have reduced the risk of explosion because the ordinary user was a farmer who would not be expected to use it as an explosive
• “Allowing litigants to adopt district court filings would provide an effective means of circumventing the page limitations on briefs set forth in the appellate rules and unnecessarily complicate the task of an appellate judge.” (citations omitted)
• A “plaintiff[] may not rely on arguments extending beyond the allegations of the complaint to overcome pleading deficiencies; rather, the complaint itself must show that plaintiff[ is] entitled to relief.” (quotation omitted)
• discussing intervening causation under Oklahoma negligence law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).