Gail Levy Schaffner v. Glencoe Park District

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[W]hat the qualifications for a position are . . . is a business decision, one courts should not interfere with.” (citation omitted)
• comments about employee lacking enthusiasm and energy, being “settled,” and being “unwilling to grow with the program” were stray remarks which failed to demonstrate pretext
• comment that plaintiff’s silver car matched his hair characterized as a “stray remark” unrelated to employer’s refusal to promote him
• stray remarks unrelated to employment decision in question do not support inference of pretext

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).