Gagnier v. Wichelhaus

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a ten month delay in filing suit was not per se unreasonable when defendants delayed in providing plaintiff with medical records and plaintiff was recovering, consulting with an attorney, and investigating her claim
• holding that a ten month delay in filing suit was not per se unreasonable when defendants delayed in providing plaintiff with medical records and plaintiff was recovering, consulting with an attorney, and investigating her claim
• holding ten months not per se unreasonable when defendants delayed in providing plaintiff with medical records, and plaintiff was recovering, consulting with an attorney, and investigating her claim
• holding ten months not per se unreasonable when defendants delayed in providing plaintiff with medical records, and plaintiff was recovering, consulting with an attorney, and investigating her claim
• holding fact question created whether ten month delay reasonable when seven months of delay was due to defendants’ refusal to provide medical records and 90 days were spent recovering from surgery, consulting attorney, conducting investigation, and filing suit

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).