Gaglione v. DiMuro

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the proof necessary to show hardship is `exacting': an applicant may not rely on bald assertions, but must set forth probative evidence such as data from financial statements
• a \general assertion that a seventy-unit condominium complex would be a more beneficial and profitable use of . . . land than a single-family home development\ does not reflect undue hardship
• \`naked assertion of economic unfeasibility is meaningless'\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).