Gagliardo v. Dumont
Citations
- 54 Cal. 496
Syllabus
<p>Homestead — Deed — Power of Attorney;— Under the Homestead Act of 1862, the alienation oE the homestead could only be by the personal act of the husband and wife; and a deed for that purpose could not be executed by attorney.</p> <p>Id.—D>. — Id. — Afteb-acquiked Title — Sep abate Property — Construction.—G., being the owner of land in San Francisco, and residing thereon with his wife, signed a declaration of homestead, and on the same day executed a power of attorney to D. to sell andfconvey “all the real estate” of G. in San Francisco, and both documents were acknowledged and recorded llio same day. Afterward, D., as the attorney of G., executed a deed of conveyance of the land to S.—the wife of G. joining in the deed. In an action of ejectment, brought by G., after the death of his wife, against the grantees of S., to recover the land, held, that the deed was void, and the plaintiff entitled to recover. Held, also, that the homestead was no part of the separate real property of the husband, and, therefore, the power of attorney did not authorize the attorney to sell and convey it.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- owner of land burdened by a nonexclusive easement retains a concurrent right of use and possession, except so far as a limitation thereon is essential to the reasonable enjoyment of the easement
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Department, McKee
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.