Gagel v. Kingston-Greene Partners, Ltd. (In Re GWF Investment, Ltd.)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “No Congressional intent that bankruptcy jurisdiction should continue for matters not involving the enforcement of rights created by Title 11.”
• since no “extenuating” circumstances were present, bankruptcy court would not retain jurisdiction after dismissal of underlying bankruptcy case
• “this court finds a clear Congressional intent that bankruptcy jurisdiction continues for the purpose of deciding proceedings ‘arising under’ title 11, despite the closing of the bankruptcy case”
• “For a proceeding to ‘arise under’ title 11, it appears that a party must be claiming a right or remedy created by one of the specific sections of title 11.”
• creditor held security interest in in-kind payments to debtor

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).