Gage v. Bailey
Citations
- 119 Ill. 539
- 9 N.E. 199
Syllabus
<p>1. Chancery—right of complainant to dismiss his bill—before and after reversal. Where no cross-bill has been filed in a suit in chancery, as a general rule a complainant may dismiss his bill at any time he may desire, before a final decree has been entered in the cause.</p> <p>2. But if a decree which has been rendered according to the prayer of the bill, shall, upon error or appeal, be reversed upon the merits, and the cause remanded “for further proceedings not inconsistent with” the opinion filed, the trial court will have nothing to do but to dismiss the bill on the merits; and in such case it will be error to allow the complainant to dismiss his bill.</p>
Judges: Craig
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Reilly v. ReillyIllinois Supreme Court· 1891-10-31· cited 16×
- Siddens v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)· 1931-02-10· cited 4×
- French v. Bellows Falls Savings InstitutionAppellate Court of Illinois· 1896-11-30· cited 3×
- Whitesides v. CookAppellate Court of Illinois· 1892-02-26· cited 2×
- Doyle v. SanfordAppellate Court of Illinois· 1888-03-20· cited 1×
- City of Chicago v. GregstenAppellate Court of Illinois· 1894-12-20
Cites
1 case in this archive is cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.