Ohio Court of Appeals· 10/26/2020
Gaffney v. Gaffney
Citations
- 2020 Ohio 5051
Syllabus
The trial court did not err in its calculation of spousal and child support. The trial court's support order was based on Husband's base income and a percentage of future bonuses. The trial court's order did not amount to a \double dip.\
Judges: Ringland
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Rigby v. RigbyOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-02-01· cited 9×
- Machen v. MillerOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-04-04· cited 9×
- Chaney v. ChaneyOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-05-02· cited 6×
- Mayer v. MayerOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-02-24· cited 5×
- Evans v. EvansOhio Court of Appeals· 2025-03-24· cited 1×
- Cusack v. CusackOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-11-18
- Vora v. VoraOhio Court of Appeals· 2026-06-22
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.