Skip to main content

Gaffney v. Gaffney

Citations

  • 2020 Ohio 5051

Syllabus

The trial court did not err in its calculation of spousal and child support. The trial court's support order was based on Husband's base income and a percentage of future bonuses. The trial court's order did not amount to a \double dip.\

Judges: Ringland

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.