Gadson Ex Rel. Gadson v. ECO Services of South Carolina, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the court is required to view the evidence and reasonable inferences in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party but concluding that the trial court’s ruling may be reversed when there is no evidence to support the ruling or when the ruling is controlled by an error of law
• declining to adopt sections 308 and 390 Restatement (Second) Torts (1965), instead expressly analyzing the facts of the case under the elements of negligent entrustment set forth in Jackson
• identifying the elements of a negligent entrustment claim as: “(1) knowledge of or knowledge imputable to the owner that the driver was either addicted to intoxicants or had the habit of drinking; (2

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).