Gadsden v. Jones Lang Lasalle Americas, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting plaintiff’s untimely Rule 56.1 Statement and deeming facts in defendant’s Rule 56.1 Statement admitted
• \Preoccupation with another trial and mere oversight are not reasons for delay that are sufficient to satisfy the standard for excusable neglect.\ (citations omitted)
• “Courts in this circuit have not .hesitated to deem admitted the facts in a movant’s Local Civil Rule 56.1 Statement that have not been controverted by a Local Civil Rule 56.1 statement from the nonmoving party.”
• “Courts in this circuit have not hesitated to deem admitted the facts in a movant’s Local Civil Rule 56.1 Statement that have not been controverted by a Local Civil Rule 56.1 statement from the nonmoving party.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).