Gaddy v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the evidence that the defendant violated a probation condition was not competent and substantial because the State presented only hearsay evidence
• holding that the State, which presented only hearsay evidence, failed to prove by competent, substantial evidence that the defendant violated a condition of his probation
• holding that the State, which presented only hearsay evidence, failed to prove by competent, substantial evidence that the defendant violated a condition of his probation
• holding that revocation of probation and sentence need not be reconsidered where one condition was not established but where competent, substantial evidence supported the trial court’s findings of violations of other conditions
• “A trial court may consider hearsay testimony at a violation of probation hearing. But, hearsay may not be the sole basis supporting a ground for revocation.” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Savage v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-08-30· cited 46×
• Cerny v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-07-22· cited 2×
• Whittaker v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-10-27
• Q.G.W.M. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-02-12
• D. D. R. v. State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2026-02-06

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Franklin v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1969-09-17· cited 24×
• Robinson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-10-13· cited 19×
• Kipp v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-07-07· cited 12×
• Robinson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-11-03· cited 11×
• Green v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-10-23· cited 8×