Skip to main content
· 6/16/1983

Gadd v. Kelley

Citations

  • 667 P.2d 251
  • 66 Haw. 431
  • 1983 Haw. LEXIS 130

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that evidence sustained the circuit court’s written findings and conclusions in support of confirmation of an arbitration award that “at all times during the proceedings, the members of the arbitration panel acted in a fair and impartial manner! ]”
  • holding that evidence sustained the circuit court’s written findings and conclusions in support of confirmation of an arbitration award that “at all times during the proceedings, the members of the arbitration panel acted in a fair and impartial manner[]”
  • rejecting a contention that arbitrators exceeded their authority in valuation of land, prevailing rate of return on the land and the effective valuation dates
  • rejecting a contention that arbitrators exceeded their authority in valuation of land, prevailing rate of return on the land and the effective valuation dates
  • prejudgment interest commences on day arbitration award is rendered, post judgment interest commences upon confirmation of arbitration award
  • “[E]ven if the arbitrators had erred ..., the court is powerless to vacate the award as long as the arbitrators’ actions did not rise to the level of the grounds specified in HRS § 658—9(4)[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lum, Nakamura, Hayashi, Vitousek, Place, Padgett, Huddy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.