Gad PEREZ; Tifferet Perez, Petitioners, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that absent evidence of legitimate arrangements for the care of the petitioner's children in the United States, the BIA need not consider hardship due to family separation
• finding that economic detriment “that one would normally expect whenever an alien is deported 2 to a country with a less vibrant economy than the United States” is not unusual or extreme
• stating that “‘[e]xtreme hardship’ is hardship that is ‘unusual or beyond that which would normally be expected’ upon depor- tation. ‘The common results of deportation are insufficient to prove extreme hardship.’” (quoting Hassan v. INS, supra, at 468)
• extreme hardship occasioned by family separation not shown where petitioners did not provide evidentiary material showing their family’s intent to separate upon petitioners’ deportation
• claim of extreme hardship based on potential family separation rejected where there was no evidence of an intent to separate family or arrangements for child's care
• a less vibrant economy is not an extreme hardship

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).