Gabriel Martin Del Campo v. Elisa Martin Del Campo

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that \[w]hile the Haligiannis factors have been considered in several cases ... they have not been deemed an exhaustive list by this Court and are not to be taken as talismanic\
• approving consideration of some of these factors and stating that the list is not exhaustive
• affirming district court’s imposition of civil penalty of over $92.8 million (maximum permissible under statute
• imposing maximum penalty in “huge and brazen . . . insider trading scheme, which . . . netted tens of millions of dollars and continued for years”
• noting that the list is not exhaustive
• declining to recognize or adopt an exclusive list of relevant factors

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).