Gable v. National Broadcasting Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding no substantial similarity where many of the elements pointed out by plaintiff were not similar when viewed in context
• noting that \plaintiff must demonstrate 'extended similarity of dialogue\ to support a claim of substantial similarity based on dialogue, and finding that no reasonable jury could conclude that works are substantially similar where, inter alia , there was no similar dialogue between works
• expert in copyright law not qualified to opine on the substantial 27 similarity between two literary works as he had no “experience, knowledge, training, or education in the literary field”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).