Court of Appeals of Maryland· 10/13/1988

Gable v. Colonial Insurance

Citations

548 A.2d 135
313 Md. 701
1988 Md. LEXIS 136

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

noting that the use of the term “has recovered” in the statute over other forms of the verb “recover,” such as “recoverable,” show the General Assembly’s intention “to allow offsets only for those [WC] benefits which have been actually received”
“if the policy provision ... is contrary to the Insurance Code, the provision is unenforceable”
“if the policy provision ... is contrary to the Insurance Code, the provision is unenforceable”
“where the Legislature has required specified coverages in a particular category of insurance, and has provided for certain exceptions or exclusions to the required coverages, additional exclusions are generally not permitted”
“[WJhere the Legislature has required specified coverages in a particular category of insurance, and has provided for certain exceptions or exclusions to the required coverages, additional exclusions are generally not permitted.”
“where the Legislature has required specified coverages in a particular category of insurance, and has provided for certain exceptions or exclusions to the required coverages, additional exclusions are generally not permitted”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Eldridge

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.