Gabe Keri v. Board of Trustees of Purdue University

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that this Court may analyze prima facie elements together with pretext where the issues overlap substantially
• holding confusion between names “First Bank” and “First Bank Iowa” is manageable
• “In a word, the Plaintiff must establish that ... [the employer’s] reasons ... were merely made up to cover up ... discriminatory reasons.”
• the nonmoving party “must come forward with specific facts showing that there is a genuine issue for trial”
• plaintiffs failed to show that defendant’s “interested in maintaining a quality education program played no interest at all in their decisions.”
• tenured university professors were not similarly situated to untenured plaintiff professor who was not reappointed after “widespread complaints from both students and supervisors”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).