Skip to main content
· 9/30/1996

Gabaldon v. Jay-Bi Property Management, Inc.

Citations

  • 925 P.2d 510
  • 122 N.M. 393

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining the need for bright-line rules and reaffirming the rule requiring contemporaneous sensory perception of the injury-producing event
  • arrival at the scene of the accident soon after it occurs but before the arrival of emergency medical personnel is “contemporaneous” with the accident
  • NIED not available to compensate for life experiences people are expected to endure
  • “It is apparent that reliance on foreseeability of injury alone in finding a duty, and thus a right to recover, is not adequate when the damages sought are for an intangible injury.” (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)
  • discussing the benefits of our bright-line rule
  • discussing need to balance competing interests

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Minzner, Ransom, Franchini

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.